implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing against Carnoso, Inc. Thus, even if the claim was resolved as against Landry's, Inc., appellants fail to demonstrate that the claim was resolved as against Carnoso, Inc. Accordingly, we conclude that the amended judgment does not resolve all claims asserted in the district court and is not a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1), see Lee v. GNLV, Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000) (defining a final judgment as one that "disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs"); see also Reno Hilton Resort Corp. v. Verderber, 121 Nev. 1, 106 P.3d 134 (2005) (concluding that NRAP 3A(b)(2) does not permit an appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion for a new trial), and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

atkr Parraguirre

Chszy t Douglas Cherry

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Janet Trost, Settlement Judge Greenberg Traurig, LLP/Las Vegas Joseph Y. Hong Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A Fe