purely legal issues, see Ostman v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 563, 565, 816 P.2d 458, 459-60 (1991); State v. Babayan,, 106 Nev. 155, 174, 787 P.2d 805, 819-20 (1990).' It is so ORDERED.

Gibbons

CC: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Legal Resource Group Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'Petitioner argues that the district applied the incorrect legal standard in reviewing his pretrial habeas petition. Because he has not shown that the district court manifestly abused its discretion in this regard, no relief is warranted. See State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Armstrong), 127 Nev., Adv. Op. 84, 267 P.3d 777, 780 (2011) (defining manifest abuse and arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e, uNNIBtiel,A