Whitton (Christopher) v. State

An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 5mm: Cwm

OF

NEVADA [a] 1947,». fl

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHRISTOPHER W'HITTON, N0. 691 1 1

I Partitions?“ " . . vs. ‘

THE STATE OF NEVADA, F a i E D

Res ancient. g m, DEC 1 l7 2015

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitisner

~ challenges criminal proceedings pending in the district caurt. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matten and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdictien in this matter. See NR8 34.160; NR8 34.170. ‘ Petitioner is represented by counsel in the prnceedings in the district court I and should proceed by and through his counsel». Accerding‘ly, we ORDER, the petition DE IED.

,J.

H‘bku ' J.

Pickering cc: Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 25 Christopher Whit;th ‘

Law Office of Betsy Allen

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark Cnunty District Attorney

W Eighth District Cnurt Clerk

! Gibbons