Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Peck (Frank) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Peck (Frank) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided December 17, 2015

Peck (Frank) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE {3F NEVADA FRAI‘M MILFORD PECK, No. 68294 Petitioner, - vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT F a L E D COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE’ . DEC 1 'r’ 2015 Respondent, and THE STATE OF N EVADA, Vs Real Part in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pm as petition for a writ 0f mandamus. Petitioner seeks an order. directing the district court to allow him t0 file his “reasmnable amended petition for a writ 0f habeas corpus (post- convictian).” We have reviewed the documents submitted in thismatten and withcut deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline: to exercise Qriginal jurisdiction in this matter. See NR8 34.160; NRS 34.170; Accordingly, we ORDER the petiticn Q IED.

’ pie/km , J.

Pickering

cc: Frank Milford Peck Attorney General/Carson City SUPRE'EWRT ; Washes {Bounty District Attorney Nam» Washoe District Court Clerk 20319471; mm» a #3 ‘ " u I"

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.