Peck (Frank) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE {3F NEVADA
FRAI‘M MILFORD PECK, No. 68294
Petitioner, - vs.
THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT F a L E D
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
WASHOE’ . DEC 1 'r’ 2015
Respondent, and
THE STATE OF N EVADA,
Vs Real Part in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is a pm as petition for a writ 0f mandamus. Petitioner seeks an order. directing the district court to allow him t0 file his “reasmnable amended petition for a writ 0f habeas corpus (post- convictian).” We have reviewed the documents submitted in thismatten and withcut deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline: to exercise Qriginal jurisdiction in this matter. See NR8 34.160; NRS 34.170; Accordingly, we
ORDER the petiticn Q IED.
’ pie/km , J.
Pickering cc: Frank Milford Peck
Attorney General/Carson City
SUPRE'EWRT ; Washes {Bounty District Attorney
Nam» Washoe District Court Clerk
20319471; mm» a #3 ‘ " u I"
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.