Nevada Supreme Court, 2015

Berry (Edward) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Berry (Edward) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided December 17, 2015

Berry (Edward) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 SUPREME COURT or NEVADA {0) 1947A W IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA N0. 6912'?

HLED DEC l 7 N15 EDWARD WARDELL BERRY,’ Petitioner, ' VS. - THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, H IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF I CIMK, Respondent, and, THE STATE OF NEVADA,

: Real Part in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PE TI TI 0N Thisls a pro se petitian for a writ of mandamus. Petitianer seeks a writ campelling the district court to I reverse its denial of We have reviewed. the dncuments submitted in this matter, and Without deciding upon :themerits 0f any claims raised therein, we» decline tn exercise Uriginal jurisdictinn in this »matter. SeaNRS 34.160; NBS 34.170.

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

I b Saitta

q_ “1‘ ,Jd Pickering cc: Edward Wardell Berry Gregory & Waldo Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attmrney Eighth District Court Clerk | E pew presentence motion to withdraw guilty plea.

I l y

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.