Berry (Edward) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123 SUPREME COURT or

NEVADA {0) 1947A W

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

N0. 6912'?

HLED

DEC l 7 N15

EDWARD WARDELL BERRY,’

Petitioner, '

VS. -

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

H IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

I CIMK,

Respondent, and,

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

: Real Part in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PE TI TI 0N

Thisls a pro se petitian for a writ of mandamus. Petitianer seeks a writ campelling the district court to I reverse its denial of We have reviewed. the dncuments submitted in this matter, and Without deciding upon :themerits 0f any claims raised therein, we» decline tn exercise Uriginal jurisdictinn in this »matter. SeaNRS 34.160; NBS 34.170. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

I b

Saitta q_ “1‘ ,Jd

Pickering cc: Edward Wardell Berry

Gregory & Waldo

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attmrney

Eighth District Court Clerk |

E pew presentence motion to withdraw guilty plea.

I l y