Beasley (Samuel) v. State
Opinion
An unpublis ed order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SAMUEL NATHANIEL BEASLEK No. 69206
Petitioner, vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, F E 3
Res ondent.
DEC 1 ? 2015
T ClE K. L DEMAN
3? P ME CCU
ORDER DENYING PETITION 3}“ “lime x
This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner seeks an order allowing him to file a petition for rehearing in this court Appeal, September 25, 20.15). We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NBS 34.160. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
‘ l “ . if , J.
Gibbons Pickering cc: Samuel Nathaniel Beasley
Attorney GeneralfCarson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk from the decision in Beasley v. State, Docket No. 68401 (Order Dismissing Somme flower or
New.“ u— V <y
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.