Sexey (James) v. State
Sexey (James) v. State
Opinion
An unpublis 9- order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE QF NEVADA
JAMES CHRIS SEXEY, § No. 99939 Appellant VS, THE STATE OF NEVADA, g L JAM—"Tum M—- i i ‘7 TRADE Pi, LlllefEP-AAM BL EUPHEME COURT BV—J» . -—— .
ORDER 131999199990 APPEAL Du» This is a pro se appeal fmm a district caurt order denying a motion to obtain a cnpy of a sealed record on an order shortening. time.
Eighth Judicial Diatrict Gaunt, Clark County; Susan Johnson, J udge.
Because no statute or enurt rulepermits an appeal from the 949, 359, 792 P.2d 1133, 1195(19991 Accordingly, we I aforementioned decisien, we lack jurisdictinn. Cnsiilio U. State, 106 N99, ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
J, I \ , Jl Dauglas Cherry co: Hen. Susan Johnson, District Judge James Chris Sexey Attnrney Generalfflarsnn City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Cnurt- Clerk SUPREME Baum it»: Nievmn . ((999439 r t I ‘ a I. ‘ I V. a V ‘
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.