Gholson v. Cricket Wireless Corp.
Gholson v. Cricket Wireless Corp.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DARRYL E. GHOLSON, AN No. 69248 INDIVIDUAL, A/K/A DARRYL E.
SAYLES, Appellant, vs. FILED CRICKET WIRELESS CORPORATION, Respondent. FEB 0 2 2016
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL On December 15, 2015, this court entered an order denying without prejudice appellant's application to proceed in forma pauperis.
The order instructed appellant to first seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Further, the order cautioned appellant that failure to properly seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court or to pay the filing fee within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN BY: kicii F.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER «»•i447 itto-02(.0 cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge Darryl E. Gholson Snell & Wilmer LLP/Salt Lake City Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER 2 IQ47
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.