Kaheaku v. Sakri (Child Custody)
Kaheaku v. Sakri (Child Custody)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SHAREEN W. KAHEAKU, No. 69587 Appellant, VS ADAM SAKRI, Respondent.
FILED FEB 0 1 2016 N EMAN A Cl ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal in a marriage dissolution and custody action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Cynthia Dianne Steel, Judge.
Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a potential jurisdictional defect. Specifically, we are unable to discern whether this court has jurisdiction to consider the instant appeal because appellant fails to identify any appealable order.
Moreover, it appears from the district court docket entries and minutes that discovery is ongoing and that the trial has been continued.
Accordingly, it appears that no final judgment has been entered. A notice of appeal filed before entry of a final written judgment is premature and of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark Cty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987). We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty
Saitta pt Pickering SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A cc: Hon. Cynthia Dianne Steel, District Judge, Family Court Division Shareen W. Kaheaku Adam Sakri Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.