Nevada Supreme Court, 2016

Barrera (Higinio) v. State

Barrera (Higinio) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 1, 2016

Barrera (Higinio) v. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69428 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69514 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

HIGINIO CAUSSE BARRERA, No. 69515 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

FILED FEB 0 1 2016 ALA: ea ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are pro se appeals from district court orders denying a motion for rehearing, a motion to stop time to exhaust all claims, and a motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jennifer P. Togliatti, Judge.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1941A oe elV11: 1MtviVehztra,a7tr€, Wrafe, Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned orders, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.'

Douglas

CC: Hon. Jennifer P. Togliatti, District Judge Higinio Causse Barrera Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this order, the pro se motion filed on January 21, 2016, is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

M) 1941A e 2 "Sztga SMIMMEISI

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.