Costantino (Derek) v. Director, & Offender Mgmt. Div.
Costantino (Derek) v. Director, & Offender Mgmt. Div.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DEREK ANTHONY COSTANTINO, No. 69563 Petitioner, vs. DIRECTOR; NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFENDER MANAGEMENT DIVISION; E.K.
MCDANIEL; DWAYNE DEAL; NEVADA FILED COURT OF APPEALS; THE FEB 1 0 2016 HONORABLE JEROME T. TAO; THE HONORABLE ABBI SILVER; THE HONORABLE MICHAEL P. GIBBONS; THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE; THE HONORABLE STEVE L.
DOBRESCU, DISTRICT JUDGE; THE STATE OF NEVADA BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS; ED GRAY; LUCILLE MONTERDE; AND MICHAEL KEELER, Respondents.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner challenges the calculation of time he has served in prison and the decisions of the district court and the Nevada Court of Appeals denying his postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the computation of time served. See Costantino v. Warden, Docket No. 67869 (Order of Affirmance, October 19, 2015). Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e see also NRAP 40B(a) ("A decision of the Court of Appeals is a final decision that is not reviewable by the Supreme Court except on petition for review."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
t ex_dth CV"' , C.J Parra uirre / ire% J.
9,01.\glas J.
Cherry
cc: Derek Anthony Costantino Attorney General/Carson City White Pine County Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.