Quinonez (Brandon) v. State
Quinonez (Brandon) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BRANDON J. QUINONEZ, No. 69530 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
FILED MAR 04 2016 TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLER?F ‘"IPREME COURT BY • - ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK
This appeal was initiated by the filing of a pro se appeal.
Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge.
Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. The right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for speedy trial. To the extent that appellant appeals from the district court order to produce prisoner, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from such an order.
Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Douglas
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA tO) 1947A e 1(, -07 0119 cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Brandon J. Quinonez Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.