Bell (Eddie) v. State
Bell (Eddie) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
EDDIE EARVIN BELL, No. 69670 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.
MAR 0 4 2016 TRACE K. UNDEMAN ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY _' CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DEPUTY CLERK
This appeal was initiated by the filing of a pro se appeal.
Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; William D. Kephart, Judge.
On January 25, 2016, appellant filed a notice of appeal. No appealable order was designated in the notice of appeal. To the extent that appellant appeals from the judgment of conviction, the notice of appeal is untimely filed. NRAP 4(b); NRS 34.575(1); NRAP 26(a); NRAP 26(c). Because an untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court, Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1
C96....41,fiA-1/ ,J.
Cherry
'In light of this order, the pro se motion filed on February 23, 2016, is denied as moot.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA ) 1947A ero 1e-070 cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Eddie Earvin Bell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.