Nevada Supreme Court, 2016

Dane v. Dist. Ct. (Geico Gen. ins.co.)

Dane v. Dist. Ct. (Geico Gen. ins.co.)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 18, 2016

Dane v. Dist. Ct. (Geico Gen. ins.co.)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TONY DANE, No. 69850 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; FILED AND THE HONORABLE JOANNA MAR 18 2016 KISHNER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original writ petition challenges a district court's delay in entering an order regarding attorney fees. It appears that the district court has entered the order that was the subject of petitioner's writ petition, and thus the writ petition is moot. Personhood Nev. v. Bristol, 126 Nev. 599, 602, 245 P.3d 572, 574 (2010) (noting that this court's duty is to resolve actual controversies). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

/..16..tfretAt; ,j.

Hardesty

' J.

Saitta Pickering

1 Wenote that although the petition was filed as an "emergency," petitioner has not demonstrated what irreparable harm would befall him if the relief he seeks is not given within 14 days. NRAP 21(a)(6); NRAP SUPREME COURT 27(e).

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge David L. Mann Georgeson Angaran, Chtd.

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0 ) 1947A e,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.