IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

YACOV JACK HEFETZ, No. 68438 Appellant, vs. CHRISTOPHER BEAVOR, Responden YACOV JACK HEFETZ, No. 68843 Appellant, vs FILED CHRISTOPHER BEAVOR, Respondent. APR 0 1 2016 ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS pure CLERK These consolidated appeals are from a district court order granting a motion to dismiss a complaint in a breach of contract action and an order granting a motion for attorney fees and costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge.

When our preliminary review of the amended docketing statement and the documents before this court revealed potential jurisdictional defects, we ordered appellant to show cause why these appeals should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. It appeared that the district court had not yet entered a written order adjudicating all the rights and liabilities of all the parties such that the June 17, 2015, order was not a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1); Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 427, 996 P.2d 416, 418 (2000). Specifically, it appeared that the claims asserted by Alis Cohen, the claims asserted against Samantha Beavor, and the counterclaims may remain pending in the district court. And in the absence of a final judgment, the order awarding attorney fees and costs is not appealable as a special order after final judgment. See NRAP 3A(b)(8).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A In response to our order, appellant has demonstrated that the claims asserted by Alis Cohen and against Samantha Beavor have been resolved. Appellant asserts that the counterclaims were dismissed when the court granted his "Rule 50(a) motion" and cites to exhibits 5 and 7 to the response. Exhibit 5 is a copy of the district court minute entries from March 1, 2013. Those entries indicate that the district court orally dismissed the counterclaims. However, the district court's minute order is ineffective. See State, Div. Child & Fam. Serv. v. Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 451, 92 P.3d 1239, 1243 (2004). Exhibit 7 is a notice of entry of judgment for the "May 17, 2013," judgment on jury verdict.' The judgment attached thereto is not file-stamped and is thus ineffective. See id.; NRCP 58(c). Moreover, the judgment does not purport to dismiss or otherwise enter judgment on the counterclaims. Appellant thus fails to demonstrate that the district court has entered a final judgment resolving all the claims of all the parties below. As a result, it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction over these appeals and we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.

3-The district court docket sheet indicates that the judgment was entered on May 21, 2013, not May 17.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A cc: Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Cohen-Johnson LLC Dickinson Wright PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk James J. Jimmerson, Settlement Judge

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A e 3