Nevada Supreme Court, 2016

Tc Westshore, LLC v. Dist. Ct. (Fx Luxury Las Vegas I, LLC)

Tc Westshore, LLC v. Dist. Ct. (Fx Luxury Las Vegas I, LLC)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 19, 2016

Tc Westshore, LLC v. Dist. Ct. (Fx Luxury Las Vegas I, LLC)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TC WESTSHORE, LLC, No. 70415 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE SLED KATHLEEN E. DELANEY, DISTRICT MAY 1 9 2016 JUDGE, Respondents, and FX LUXURY LAS VEGAS I, LLC, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a petition for a writ of mandamus and prohibition challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a commercial eviction matter. Having considered the documents and arguments presented in this matter, we conclude that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).' Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J Hardesty

J.

Saitta Pickering

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Marquis Aurbach Coffing McDonald Carano Wilson LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

'Petitioner's emergency motion to stay the district court hearing is denied as moot. We note that the motion could be denied on the alternate basis that petitioner failed to first seek a stay in the district court. NRAP 8(a)(1). Petitioner failed to demonstrate that first moving for a stay in the district court would have been impracticable. NRAP 8(a)(2)(A)(i).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.