IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JONATHAN MUNDO, No. 70212 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JUN 1 6 2016 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF K. LINDEMAN CLARK; AND DIRECTOR, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BY Y ir SAVA CI DEP Respondents.

JONATHAN WAYNE MUNDO, No. 70320 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; THE HONORABLE SUSAN JOHNSON, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND DIRECTOR, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondents.

ORDER DENYING PETITIONS These are pro se petitions for a writ of mandamus and writ of prohibition challenging the validity of a judgment of conviction based upon alleged violations of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a postconviction petition

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA e 0) 194 7A

PM4 Icr- Fat?) for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. 1 NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we ORDER the petitions DENIED.

J.

Douglas chsut J.

Cher (1 , J.

Gibbons

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Jonathan Wayne Mundo Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

'We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) Mak e