IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAVID AUGUST KILLE, SR., No. 70300 Petitioner, vs. FILED THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUL 1 3 2016 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion for summary judgment.

Having considered the petition and the supporting documents, are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Among other reasons, petitioner has an adequate remedy in the form of an appeal from a final judgment. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841; see Consol.

Generator-Nev., Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co., 114 Nev. 1304, 1312, 971 P.2d 1251, 1256 (1998) (recognizing that interlocutory orders may be challenged in the context of an appeal from a final judgment).

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

erry

, J.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A (AMP tO__t 1_3 cc: David August Kille, Sr. Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A