Nevada Supreme Court, 2016

Thomas (Christopher) v. Warden

Thomas (Christopher) v. Warden
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 16, 2016

Thomas (Christopher) v. Warden

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHRISTOPHER THOMAS, No. 70835 Petitioner, vs. E.K. MCDANIEL; AND JAMES DZURENDA, Respondents.

CLEr BY .

SEP 1 82016 ,1E tinEMAN

I. 11

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a "writ of mandamus or in alternative show cause." Petitioner challenges the way the Nevada Department of Corrections is deducting his statutory good-time credits.

We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170.

A challenge to the computation of time served must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(c); NRS 34.738(1).

Petitioner has recently raised the same issue in another petition for a writ of mandamus. See Thomas v. McDaniel, Docket No. 70301 (Order Denying Petition, June 16, 2016). Petitioner is cautioned that statutory credits may be forfeited if he files frivolous documents in a

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A ea:, civil action. See NRS 209.451. Repeatedly raising the same issue constitutes frivolous action. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J.

Parraguirre

/- Hardesty

Piek.046i J.

Pickering

cc: Christopher Thomas Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.