IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TEXICALLI, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED No. 70914 LIABILITY COMPANY; AND RI SANDOVAL, AN INDIVIDUAL, Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SEP 1 6 2016 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ciTaa§Kayir.Sur IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; BY CLERK CHIEF DE AND THE HONORABLE TIMOTHY C.

WILLIAMS, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and NEW EL PORTAL PROPERTY LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED-LIABILITY COMPANY, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to strike a request for a trial de novo after mandatory court-annexed arbitration proceedings.

Having considered the petition and appendix filed in this matter, we conclude that petitioners have not demonstrated that the district court arbitrarily or capriciously exercised its• discretion. Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). Accordingly, our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ea, itp (1991) (holding that this court has the discretion to determine whether to consider a writ petition), and we ORDER the petition DENIED. _

Parraguirre

, J.

Hardesty

J.

Pickering

cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge Nobles & Yanez Law Firm Sklar Williams LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A