Clark (Ronald) v. Warden
Clark (Ronald) v. Warden
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RONALD CLARK, No. 70956 Petitioner, vs. DWIGHT NEVEN, WARDEN; HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON OFFENDER FILED MANAGEMENT DIVISION; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, bEp 1 6 2016 Ri Respondents. CA tit 1A4WAK ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner complains that the district court has not timely ruled on his post- conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus (credits). We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist.
Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228-29, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (explaining that petitioners bear burden to demonstrate that writ relief is warranted). We expect the district court will resolve all pending matters as expeditiously as its calendar permits. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
I CL.Ait , C,.J.
Parraguirre
J. J.
Hardesty
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e79 cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Ronald Clark Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.