Wiesner v. Wiesner
Wiesner v. Wiesner
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DEANN JUSTINE WIESNER, No, 65642 Appellant, vs. DANIEL ALLAN WIESNER, FILED Respondent. SEP 2 6 2016 TRACIE K. LINDEMAN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY S. `/ DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL On July 28, 2014, this court entered an order denying without prejudice appellant's application to proceed in forma pauperis. The order instructed appellant to first seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Further, the order cautioned appellant that failure to properly seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court or to pay the filing fee within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.' It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN BY: Jath cc: Hon. Kenneth E. Pollock, District Judge DeAnn Justine Wiesner Daniel Allan Wiesner Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT 'In light of this disposition, any pending motions are rendered moot.
OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER (01-190 .getto, lb -2M7(00
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.