Wiesner v. Wiesner
Wiesner v. Wiesner
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DEANN WIESNER, AND ON BEHALF No. 65505 OF KATIE WIESNER (MINOR), Appellant, vs. FILE DANIEL WIESNER, Respondent. SEP 2 6 2 016 1RAC1E K. LiNDEMAN CLERKff SUPREME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL On July 28, 2014, this court entered an order denying without prejudice appellant's application to proceed in forma pauperis. The order instructed appellant to first seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Further, the order cautioned appellant that failure to properly seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court or to pay the filing fee within 30 days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.i
It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN BY: : t 41,1 bat light of this disposition, any pending motions or documents are 'In light rendered moot.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER 101-1947 oatip I - 2-q 75(o cc: Hon. Kenneth E. Pollock, District Judge DeAnn Justine Wiesner Daniel Allan Wiesner Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER (01-1937 e
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.