Bell (Eddie) v. State

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

EDDIE EARVIN BELL, No. 71143 Petitioner, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. OCT 1 3 2016 ELIZABETH A BROWN CLER*OF UPREME COUNT BY DEPUTY CLERK ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court decision denying a NRCP 60(b) motion. Petitioner asserts fraud because the State prepared the order disposing of his motion.

Petitioner fails to demonstrate extraordinary relief is warranted as a prevailing party may prepare a dispositional order for the court. See NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (noting that petitioner bears burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 603-04, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981) (providing that a writ of mandamus may issue to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Cherry

Dtp LAP, (GS „\------ , J.

Douglas Gibbons

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A eP 1(0 - 3Iq 8g cc: Eddie Earvin Bell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A 47Stim