Wirth (Charles) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Wirth (Charles) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CHARLES MATTHEW WIRTH, ATo. 70920 Petitioner, vs. THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NYE; FILED AND THE HONORABLE KIMBERLY A. NOV 1 7 2016 WANKER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
CHARLES MATTHEW WIRTH, No. 70921 Petitioner, vs. THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NYE; AND THE HONORABLE KIMBERLY A.
WANKER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITIONS These are pro se petitions for writs of mandamus, or alternatively, writs of prohibition. Petitioner Charles Wirth seeks an order directing the filing and consideration of various motions and an order granting his motion to correct an illegal sentence because the district court has allegedly not complied with the writ of mandamus issued in Wirth v. Fifth Judicial Dist. Court, Docket No. 69108 (Order Granting Petition, June 13, 2016). Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in these matters, we decline to exercise SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A )421(4)9 our original jurisdiction because petitioner has failed to provide any documents supporting the allegations in the petitions. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330. Accordingly, we ORDER the petitions DENIED.
q , C.J.
ParraguirtY
4-07,1 Hardesty
cc: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge Charles Matthew Wirth Attorney General/Carson City Nye County District Attorney Nye County Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.