Pullen (Margaret) v. Allen
Pullen (Margaret) v. Allen
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARGARET PULLEN, No. 71313 Petitioner, vs. CHUCK ALLEN, FILED Respondent.
NOV 1 7 2016
ORDER DENYING PETITION This petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges petitioner's confinement pursuant to a judgment of conviction.' Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. 2 NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34338(1). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
, C.J.
Parraguirre
J. Atm: Pickering
'Petitioner has not provided this court with a copy of her judgment of conviction and it is unclear whether she has been charged with or convicted of a criminal offense.
We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A &T-3661.1 1 cc: Margaret Pullen Attorney General/Carson City Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A i'lefM•
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.