IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHARLES JOSEPH MAKE, No. 69049 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. NOV 1 7 2016 BROWN It CLERK RT

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion to amend the judgment of conviction. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Lidia Stiglich, Judge.

Appellant Charles Maki argues that the judgment of conviction did not comply with NRS 176.105. The district court denied the motion because a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus is the proper remedy to challenge the validity of the judgment of conviction and sentence and the claims raised fell outside the scope of a motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence. Based upon our review of the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion.' Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

C.J Parraguirre

J.

Hardesty 'Appellant may challenge the alleged failure to conduct a timely parole hearing in a petition for a writ of mandamus filed in the district SUPREME COURT court in the first instance. See NRS 34.160.

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

'A! io—S 5ei cip " cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge Charles Joseph Maki Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A