Nevada Supreme Court, 2016

Honeycutt (Todd) v. Bisbee

Honeycutt (Todd) v. Bisbee
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided November 17, 2016

Honeycutt (Todd) v. Bisbee

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TODD MICHAEL HONEYCUTT, No. 71281 Petitioner, vs. CONNIE S. BISBEE; ISIDRO BACA, FILED WARDEN; NEVADA PAROLE BOARD; AND NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF Nov 1 7 2016 CORRECTIONS, Resoondents.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging the Parole Board's denial of parole. We are not satisfied that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted at this time. Because the claims involve issues of fact, petitioner should seek relief in the district court in the first instance. See Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 604, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981); see also NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.320.

Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

,t,4 a. C Parraguirre

Hardesty

cc: Todd Michael Honeycutt Attorney General/Carson City

SUPREME COURT 'We deny petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel.

OF NEVADA

(0) 1047A ..e). -35t( REM

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.