Holmgren (Andrew) v. State
Holmgren (Andrew) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ANDREW JOHN HOLMGREN, No. 71392 Petitioner, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
FILED NOV 1 7 2016 ETH „k ir
L ORDER DENYING PETITION AT :17 9))11-. 7P-117T9
This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. 1 Petitioner seeks release from custody. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction as petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. 2 See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.700. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
CL---(2 6-C7Ca Parraguirre
Zi—Ot1/4_\ J.
Hardesty
cc: Andrew John Holmgren Attorney General/Carson City
1 The motion to waive the filing fee is denied as no filing fee was charged. See NRS 2.250(1)(d)(3).
2We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A Rt. -357
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.