Boylan v. Dist. Ct. (Aircraft Partner N60xm Dst)
Boylan v. Dist. Ct. (Aircraft Partner N60xm Dst)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SCOTT JACOB BOYLAN, AN No. 71442 INDIVIDUAL, Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NOV 1 8 2016 WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE LYNNE K. SIMONS, DISTRICT JUDGE, CCERK Respondents, -
and AIRCRAFT PARTNER N60XM DST, A DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST; 11.10 N345AP DST, A DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST; AIRCRAFT PARTNER N8244L DST, A DELAWARE STATUTORY TRUST; AND AND REI PALCHEVSKI, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION This original petition for a writ of prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to quash service of process.' Having considered the petition and appendix, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. NRS 34.320; Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (providing that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth 'The petition alternatively seeks a writ of mandamus, but a "writ of prohibition is the appropriate remedy for a district court's erroneous refusal to quash service of process." Grupo Famsa v. Eighth Judicial Dist.
Court, 132 Nev., Adv. Op. 29, 371 P.3d 1048, 1050 (2016).
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A .119007 Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (explaining that it is within this court's sole discretion to determine if a writ petition will be considered). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
, Hardesty
J.
cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge Kent Law Fennemore Craig Jones Vargas/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA AA 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.