IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JMR CABINET CORPORATION; KLEIN No. 70681 CABINETS LLC; RANDOLPH DAVID KLEIN; JACQUELYN PAGE KLEIN; DAVID MELVIN KLEIN; AND RANDOLPH JOSEPH KLEIN, FILED Petitioners, vs. DEC 0 2 2016 THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ELIZABETH A. BROWN COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, BY IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JOANNA KISHNER, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and DAVID HAMMER; AND TAMARA HAMMER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a tort and contract action. Based on the petition, answer, reply, and current record, we are not persuaded that the district court's determination was arbitrary and capricious or in contravention of clearly established law such that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted at this time.

NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist.

Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004) (stating that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief and recognizing that petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (noting that this court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss or for summary judgment). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, C.J.

Parraguirre

tet49,1 , J.

Hardesty

Pickering &pi J.

cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge Harris Law Office Rogers, Mastrangelo, Carvalho & Mitchell, Ltd. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (01 I947A .4907A.