Nevada Supreme Court, 2016

Redmond v. Dignity Health

Redmond v. Dignity Health
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided December 12, 2016

Redmond v. Dignity Health

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARLENE REDMOND, No. 70827 INDIVIDUALLY, Appellant, vs. DIGNITY HEALTH, D/B/A ST. ROSE ALE DOMINICAN HOSPITAL-SAN MARTIN CAMPUS; AND HERMINIA DIOKNO, DEC 1 Z 2016 INDIVIDUALLY, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss. Respondents have filed a motion to strike the notice of appeal on the ground that it was filed before the entry of a final judgment.

Appellant has filed an untimely motion for an extension of time to file an opposition; the motion is opposed, and appellant has filed a reply. We grant the motion for an extension and direct the clerk of this court to file the opposition to the motion to strike received on October 6, 2016. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the record on appeal, we grant the motion to strike, and we dismiss this appeal. The district court order appealed from dismissed appellant's negligence/premises liability claims, but the claim for professional negligence remains, and respondents SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4B77.9 inform this court that trial has been set for June 26, 2017. Accordingly we conclude that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed, we lack jurisdiction and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1

416-4 Hardesty Pickering

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Marlene Redmond Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders Eighth District Court Clerk

1 Respondents' motion for reconsideration of the order directing transmission of the record is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

0) l47A e :utce.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.