IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROBERT N. PECCOLE; AND NANCY A. No. 71608 PECCOLE, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ALE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF DEC 1 6 2016 CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DOUGLAS SMITH, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and CITY OF LAS VEGAS; FORE STARS, LTD.; 180 LAND CO., LLC; SEVENTY ACRES, LLC; EHB COMPANIES, LLC; YOHAN LOWIE; VICKIE DEHART; AND FRANK PANKRATZ, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION This original petition for a writ of prohibition challenges the respondent district court's jurisdiction to decide a pending motion to dismiss filed by the defendants who remain parties below. .

Having considered the petition and appendix, we conclude that petitioners have not demonstrated that a writ of prohibition is warranted. NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228-29, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Appeals from interlocutory orders do not divest the district court of jurisdiction over the case or to resolve matters

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A c(4:144 that do not affect the appeal's merits. Mack-Manley v. Manley, 122 Nev. 849, 855, 138 P.3d 525, 529-30 (2006); Hanley v. Zenoff, 81 Nev. 9, 13, 398 P.2d 241, 243 (1965). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Chs2- , J.

Cherry

D 1,0-4) Irv) Douglas J.

Gibbons

cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge Peccole & Peccole Las Vegas City Attorney The Jimmerson Law Firm, P.0 Sklar Williams LLP EHB Companies, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (D) 1947A 0