Goldstein v. Dist. Ct. (Pn II, Inc.)
Goldstein v. Dist. Ct. (Pn II, Inc.)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LARRY GOLDSTEIN; AND HANNAH No, 69708 IRSFELD GOLDSTEIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Petitioners, vs. FILED THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEC 22 2016 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JERRY A. WIESE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and PN II, INC., D/B/A PULTE HOMES OF NEVADA, A NEVADA CORPORATION; AND TERRAVITA HOME CONSTRUCTION CO., AN ARIZONA CORPORATION, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a partial summary judgment in a fraud and construction defect action. We conclude that our intervention is not warranted because petitioner may appeal from any adverse final judgment and therefore has an adequate remedy at law and the record is not sufficiently developed to allow for this court's meaningful review at this time. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din.
Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224-25, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004); see also Round Hill Gen. Imp. Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 637 P.2d 534 (1981).
Accordingly, we SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A aes I Inc 9.Y5Q_ ORDER the petition DENIED.
/L Hardesty
n)45L_JZ Stiglich
cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Irsfeld & Associates, LLC Parker & Edwards Koeller Nebeker Carlson & Haluck, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) IJ47A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.