Nevada Supreme Court, 2017

State v. Dist. Ct. (Aguilera-Herrera (Francisco))

State v. Dist. Ct. (Aguilera-Herrera (Francisco))
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided January 12, 2017

State v. Dist. Ct. (Aguilera-Herrera (Francisco))

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THE STATE OF NEVADA, No. 71724 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JAN 1 2 2017 RICHARD SCOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE, EL.17ABETr! A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Respondents, BY 6- V DEFUN (1.4CLD2i and FRANCISCO AGUILERA-HERRERA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION The State seeks a writ directing the district court to vacate its order severing the trial of Francisco Aguilera-Herrera, the real party in interest, from that of his codefendant. We conclude that extraordinary relief is unwarranted because petitioner has not demonstrated the district court arbitrarily or capriciously exercised its discretion. NRS 34.160; see State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Armstrong), 127 Nev. 927, 931, 267 P.3d 777, 779 (2011) ("An arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion is one founded on prejudice or preference rather than on reason or contrary to the evidence or established rules of law." (citations and quotation marks omitted)). The district court considered relevant authority in its evaluation of the merits of the motion to sever. See Tabish v. State, 119 Nev. 293, 304, 72 P.3d 584, 591 (2003) (requiring court to consider whether "joinder is so manifestly prejudicial that it outweighs the dominant concern with judicial economy" (quotation marks omitted)).

Even if another jurist could come to a different conclusion that would not be sufficient to warrant extraordinary relief. See Collier v. Legakes, 98 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A - 01203 Nev. 307, 310, 646 P.2d 1219, 1221 (1982) ("[W]hile mandamus lies to enforce ministerial acts or duties and to require the exercise of discretion, it will not serve to control the proper exercise of that discretion or to substitute the judgment of this court for that of the lower tribunal."), overruled on other grounds by State u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Zogheib), 130 Nev., Adv. Op. 18, 321 P.3d 882 (2014). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

, J.

Gibbons

Pickering

cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Clark County Public Defender Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A stIZIjo

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.