Nevada Supreme Court, 2017

Carr (Stephen) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Carr (Stephen) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 16, 2017

Carr (Stephen) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STEPHEN CARR, No. 71772 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB FEB162017 BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging an order of the district court. Having considered the petition and appendix filed in this matter, we conclude that petitioner fails to demonstrate that extraordinary relief is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; PanS v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

itit4" , J.

Hardesty

, J.

Parraguirre `Stiglich.

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Mueller Hinds & Associates Attorney General/Carson City SUPREME COURT OF Clark County District Attorney NEVADA Eighth District Court Clerk (0) I947A ea)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.