Nevada Supreme Court, 2017

Braunstein (Steven) v. the Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.

Braunstein (Steven) v. the Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 17, 2017

Braunstein (Steven) v. the Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, No. 72021 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; FILED THE HONORABLE MICHAEL VILLANI, FEB 1 7 2017 DISTRICT JUDGE; AND CLARK ELIZABETH Pt. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, By Respondents. DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner states that he is challenging a vexatious litigant determination. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction because petitioner fails to present any cogent legal arguments regarding the vexatious litigant determination and fails to provide any of the necessary documents to review this determination (for example, the February 2014 prefiling injunction and order and transcripts of the hearing in which he was found to be a vexatious litigant). See NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (recognizing that a petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

/ J.

Hardesty

SUPREME COURT culthcc—szcrr , J. J OF NEVADA Parraguirre Stiglich (0) 1947A eD 0- OS7 0 to. cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Steven Samuel Braunstein Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A (41Pr•

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.