Nevada Supreme Court, 2017

Credit Union 1 v. Dist. Ct. (Landbank Dev. Co., LLC)

Credit Union 1 v. Dist. Ct. (Landbank Dev. Co., LLC)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 1, 2017

Credit Union 1 v. Dist. Ct. (Landbank Dev. Co., LLC)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CREDIT UNION 1, AN ILLINOIS No. 70131 STATE CHARTERED CREDIT UNION AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO CUMORAH CREDIT UNION, Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE SCOTT N. FREEMAN, DISTRICT MAR 0 1 2017 JUDGE, CLEF nESTib;i7h-raPCOURT Respondents, BY capixn, and LANDBANK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; MARINA COMMERCIAL OFFICES, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND DARREN PROULX, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A MEMBER AND/OR AUTHORIZED AGENT OF LANDBANK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC AND MARINA COMMERCIAL OFFICES, LLC, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging an order denying a motion for summary judgment. Having considered the petition and supporting documents in this original proceeding, we decline to intervene at this time, as an adequate remedy exists in the form of an SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

Algto (0) 1947A -ooa appeal from any adverse final judgment. NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (noting that this court will generally not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying motions for summary judgment). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

C.J.

J.

Douglas

21 241tesa-- z Gilitons : , J.

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Laxalt & Nomura, Ltd./Reno Law Offices of Mark Wray Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 19474 CD

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.