Nevada Supreme Court, 2017

Howard v. Chronister

Howard v. Chronister
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 13, 2017

Howard v. Chronister

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ABDUL HOWARD, No. 72381 Appellant, vs. JOSEPH R. CHRONISTER; CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS; ROGER M.

CRAM; JAMES R. SWEETIN; THE ALE STATE OF NEVADA; AND ERIC MAR 1 3 2017 JERGENSON, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order dismissing appellant's complaint against respondent City of North Las Vegas. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; James Crockett, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the district court has not entered a final written judgment adjudicating all the rights and liabilities of all the parties, and the district court did not certify its order as final pursuant to NRCP 54(b). Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000); KDI Sylvan Pools v. Workman, 107 Nev. 340, 810 P.2d 1217 (1991); Rae v. All American Life & Cas. Co., 95 Nev. 920, 605 P.2d 196 (1979). The following claims and parties appear to remain below: appellant's claims against respondents Joseph R,

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A aM(c7 Chronister, Roger Cram, Eric Jergenson, and the State of Nevada.

Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we

■4704<e ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

° , Douglas

J.

J.

Pickering

cc: Hon. James Crockett, District Judge Abdul Howard North Las Vegas City Attorney Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.