In Re: Matter of S.H.
In Re: Matter of S.H.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IN THE MATTER OF: S. H., MINOR No. 71901 CHILD.
PETER J. H., Appellant, vs. STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT FILED OF FAMILY SERVICES, MAR 1 4 2017 Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from three separate family court permanency plan orders, an order denying a motion to dismiss and modify the plan, and several orders to produce appellant to appear at the permanency plan hearings. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; David R. Gamble, Judge.
Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the orders designated in the notice of appeal are not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a permanency plan, a motion denying a motion to dismiss or modify a permanency plan, or an
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A zcreZtia 17- CE(Sq, order to produce a prisoner. We conclude, therefore, that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED)
J.
idell4a64 J.
Stiglich
cc: Chief Judge, The Fifth Judicial District Court Hon. David R. Gamble, Senior Judge Peter Jason Helfrich Attorney General/Carson City Nye County District Attorney Nye County Clerk
'Rased on this order, we take no action in regard to the pro se documents filed on March 2 and 14, 2017.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.