Nevada Supreme Court, 2017

Lara-Vega v. Select Portfolio Serv., Inc.

Lara-Vega v. Select Portfolio Serv., Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 11, 2017
Lara-Vega v. Select Portfolio Serv., Inc.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JORGE A. LARA-VEGA, No. 70739

Appellant, vs.

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.,

Respondent. IL

12.017

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a petition for judicial review of a foreclosure mediation. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.

Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant is not an aggrieved party. The district court denied respondent's petition for judicial review on the ground that respondent acted in bad faith and failed to produce mandatory documents at the mediation. Appellant submitted an untimely response to the motion to dismiss that was returned unfiled. Appellant then filed a response to respondent's motion for a third extension of time to file the answering brief pending resolution of the motion to dismiss. Appellant objects that he is aggrieved because on appeal he wants this court to compel respondent to produce the documents.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

97) 1947A di_fig Having considered the arguments of the parties, we grant the motion to dismiss, and

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

- Douglas

30$74 J.

Gibbous lett J.

Pickering P cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge

Jorge A. Lara-Vega Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk 'We deny as moot respondent's motions for an extension of time to file the answering brief.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) ](47A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.