Nevada Supreme Court, 2017

Rimer (Stanley) v. State

Rimer (Stanley) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided April 21, 2017

Rimer (Stanley) v. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STANLEY EARNEST RIMER, No. 71451 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

STANLEY EARNEST RIMER, No. 71855 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

STANLEY EARNEST RIMER, No. 71856 1 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

FILE APR 2 1 2017 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By DEPUgAC-It_-lig ER <

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are pro se notices of appeal from district court orders denying a "motion to vacate void judgment for the state courts violation of subject matter jurisdiction," denying a motion to disqualify a district court judge, and denying a "motion to strike false information from PSI and motion for order for parole hearing." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned orders, we lack jurisdiction to consider these appeals.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990).

Accordingly, we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.'

Hardesty

Parraguirre ch-S tn Stiglich

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Stanley Earnest Rimer Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

"In light of this order, we take no action on the pro se motions filed in Docket Nos. 71451, 71855 and 71856.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.