Rimer (Stanley) v. State
Rimer (Stanley) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
STANLEY EARNEST RIMER, No, 71451 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
STANLEY EARNEST RIMER, No. 71855 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
STANLEY EARNEST RIMER, No. 71856 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILED APR 2 1 2017 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT Dr DEPUTY CLERK or
ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are pro se notices of appeal from district court orders denying a "motion to vacate void judgment for the state courts violation of subject matter jurisdiction, " denying a motion to disqualify a district court judge, and denying a "motion to strike false information from PSI and motion for order for parole hearing. " Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned orders, we lack jurisdiction to consider these appeals.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (01 1947A 13'litJ Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990).
Accordingly, we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.'
A Hardesty O_A 44 ;
Parraguirre clasteCa Ain.fic4.0 Stiglich
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Stanley Earnest Rimer Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
'In light of this order, we take no action on the pro se motions filed in Docket Nos. 71451, 71855 and 71856.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
f)) •747,‘ 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.