Perez-Perez (Rode) v. Warden
Perez-Perez (Rode) v. Warden
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RODE PEREZ-PEREZ, No. 71007 Appellant, vs. BRIAN WILLIAMS, WARDEN; THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; AND THE STATE LED OF NEVADA, MAY 0 9 2017 Resnondents.
CL (FWV,L7,tivf.VF„: -xl,up, BY
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying appellant Rode Perez-Perez's April 22, 2016, postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge. Perez-Perez challenges the computation of time he has served. We affirm. 1 Perez-Perez complains that the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC) is not applying statutory credits to his parole eligibility. The version of NRS 209.4465 that he relies upon applied to
'This appeal has been submitted for decision on the record without briefing or oral argument. NRAP 34(f)(3), (g); see also NRAP 31(d)(1); Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A crimes committed before July 1, 2007. See 2007 Nev. Stat., ch. 525, § 22, at 3196. The offense in this case was committed in 2012. Perez-Perez's claim thus lacks merit, and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
Douglas
Pickering
cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Rode Perez-Perez Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A cOglittS.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.