Floyd (James) v. Warden
Floyd (James) v. Warden
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JAMES KENNETH FLOYD, No. 71355 Appellant, vs. ISIDRO BACA, WARDEN, Respondent. FILED JUN 1 5 2017 ELIZABElli A. BROWN CLERK QF SUPREME COURT DEPUTYS4-E C I:Li CLL
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying appellant James Floyd's July 19, 2016, postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; William A.
Maddox, Judge. Floyd challenged the computation of time he has served.
We affirm.' Floyd claimed that the Nevada Department of Corrections is not deducting statutory credits from his minimum sentences pursuant to NRS 209.4465(7)(b). Floyd's claim lacks merit. NRS 209.4465(7) begins, "Except as otherwise provided in subsection[ ] 8," and NRS 209.4465(8) specifically excludes offenders convicted of category B felonies from deducting statutory credits from their minimum sentences. Floyd's controlling sentences are for category B felonies, see NRS 205.060; NRS 205.275(2)(c), that were committed after the effective date of NRS
'This appeal has been submitted for decision on the record without briefing or oral argument. NRAP 34(0(3), (g); see also NRAP 31(d)(1); Lockett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
9)1 1947A 444W4,A4 A -ig$4,5 209.4465(8). Accordingly, Floyd is not entitled to the deduction of credits from his minimum sentences, and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
4144G4-.0 Stiglich
cc: First Judicial District Court, Dept. 1 Hon. William A. Maddox, Senior Judge James Kenneth Floyd Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.