Danjou (Gaston) v. State
Danjou (Gaston) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
GASTON JOSEPH DANJOU, No. 71263 Appellant, vs. FILED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. JUN 1 5 2017 ELIZABETU A. BROWN CLERKg PREME COURT BY DEPUTY CLERK ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying appellant's postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.
Appellant's petition alleged that the Nevada Revised Statutes are unconstitutional. The district court denied his petition because it was not in substantial compliance with the provisions set forth in NRS 34.735.
We have reviewed the documents on file with this court and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See NRS 34.724(2)(a); NRS 34.735. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
/SA gt4-1Ct Hardesty
Ain414-4 Parraguirre Stiglich
1 We conclude that a response to the pro se brief is not necessary.
NRAP 46A(c). This appeal therefore has been submitted for decision based on the pro se brief and the record. See NRAP 34(0(3).
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) E947A 11- I an 0 7 cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Gaston Joseph Danjou Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.