IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THAD MONOLETTI AUBERT, No. 71619 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FD JUN 2 0 2017 E'r !,74;SETH A,BrATV;ki CLEfr CIWIJ:crtairletaIRT BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL On May 15, 2017, this court entered an order directing appellant to clarify the basis for the instant appeal. Appellant has filed a timely response, indicating that he is attempting to reargue issues that were already decided by the court of appeals in Docket No. 68534. 1 Specifically, appellant confirms that he is attempting to appeal from a district court order entered July 31, 2015. Not only has that appeal already been decided in Docket No. 68534, the instant notice of

'Appellant's petition for review in Docket No. 68534 was denied by this court on May 17, 2017, and the remittitur issued in that appeal on June 13, 2017.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A e appeal is untimely. 2 NRS 34.575. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Gibbcffis Pickering

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Thad Monoletti Aubert Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court.

Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 871 P.2d 944 (1994).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A