Sokolwski v. Chafetz
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
WILLIAM A. SOKOLOWSKI; AND No. 72299 CURTIS W. ACTION, DERIVATIVELY
ON BEHALF OF LAS VEGAS SANDS
CORP.,
Appellants, vs.
IRWIN CHAFETZ; CHARLES D.
JUN 2 1 201? FORMAN; IRWIN A. SIEGEL;
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP;
FREDERICK HIP WELL; AND LAS
VEGAS SANDS CORP.,
Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Certain parties to this appeal previously filed a stipulation to withdraw and dismiss this appeal. Because the stipulation was not signed by all respondents, the clerk of this court entered an order treating the stipulation as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal and granting the motion. Counsel for respondent Las Vegas Sands Corp. has now filed a stipulation to dismiss the appeal that is signed by counsel for the remaining respondents. Counsel indicated to the clerk of this court in a telephone conversation that he wishes this appeal to be dismissed via stipulation rather than a motion. Cause appearing, we vacate the clerk's order entered on June 2, 2017, and hereby dismiss this appeal pursuant to SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1.1474 the parties' stipulation. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).
It is so ORDERED.
cc: Hon. Nancy L Allf, District Judge
Ara H. Shirinian, Settlement Judge
Albright Stoddard Warnick & Albright
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz
Greenfield & Goodman, LLC
DLA Piper LLP/San Diego
Latham & Watkins LLP
Santoro Whitmire
DLA Piper LLP/Chicago
Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas
Morris Law Group
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A e
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.