IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOEL CRUZ RIVEROL, Appellant, No. 72916 MEP vs. JUL 10 07 THE STATE OF NEVADA, ELIZABETH A. BRIMN.

Respondent. CLEFtK Ot .UPREME CoURT BY DEPUTY CLE JOEL CRUZ RIVEROL, No. 72991 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

JOEL CRUZ RIVEROL, No. 73284 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS These are pro se appeals from district court orders denying a "motion to investigate, inspect security surveillance footage," denying a motion to suppress, and denying a motion to appoint counsel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michelle Leavitt, Judge.

Our review of these appeals reveals jurisdictional defects.

Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from district court orders denying a "motion to investigate, inspect security surveillance footage," denying a motion to suppress, and denying a motion to appoint counsel. See NRS 177.015(2) (only the State may appeal from a pretrial order granting or denying a motion to suppress); Castillo v. State, 106 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

22(e. V 7Annt." Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider these appeals, and we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.

—1( Hardesty

Ate45G4-0 :Sjataljtat r" Parraguirre Stiglich

CC: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Joel Cruz Riverol Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

ru;A 715reila yet '1374101