Brown v. State, Dep't of Corr.
Brown v. State, Dep't of Corr.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CORNELIUS BROWN, No. 72127 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FILED Respondent. AUG 2 2 2017 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT By.--ac ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK
Pro se appellant seeks to challenge a district court order granting a motion to strike. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order, it is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). As we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1
Sat\ J.
Hardesty
Parraguirre
A•atelt.f) J.
Stiglich
'In light of this order, we take no action regarding the district court's August 9, 2017, order regarding appellant's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 10/ 1947A eto I 7- 25151 cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Cornelius Edward Brown, Sr. Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947.4 e
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.